Rand likes to analyze things both metaphysically and epistemologically; can someone give examples of this and explain it?
Oct 06 '12 at 18:08
Oct 06 '12 at 22:52
Greg Perkins ♦♦
You make an assertion, that "Ayn Rand likes to analyze things both metaphysically and epistemologically."
Why do you believe this?
It is not a self-evident fact, so why do you assert it? What is the evidence for your assertion?
oh sorry; in some of her works on axiomatic concepts she says something along the lines of that they (axiomatic concepts) designate metaphysical absolutes and are the products of epistemology necessities. I'm just interested in how you would analyze this. Thanks
ITOE2 pg. 58 This gives us a lead to another special aspect of axiomatic concepts: although they designate a fundamental metaphysical fact, axiomatic concepts are the products of an epistemological need—the need of a volitional, conceptual consciousness which is capable of error and doubt.
Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here
Answers and Comments
Asked: Oct 06 '12 at 18:08
Seen: 1,976 times
Last updated: Oct 08 '12 at 16:24
Do concepts exist?
How can an abstraction like "Existence" exist outside of the mind?
Doesn't Rand's sense of capitalism have its referents determined by its definition?
Is it possible for reality to be a simulation?
How does one refute the idea that life is possibly a dream?
Can a visual model of the hierarchy of concepts be created?
What is the difference between "existence" and the universe?
How can you know that Ayn Rand's theory of concepts is true?
What's a difference between 'units' and 'things'?
How do we perceive things as sum of parts?