login about faq

If there exist a temporaly shot change in some thing, let's say that it lasts 1 nanosecond can we perceive it directly? I mean if we see an object that appears to be the same to us but is it possible that it changes in those short periods that we possibly cannot perceive?

asked Oct 14 '12 at 06:36

kevindurant's gravatar image

kevindurant
50

edited Oct 14 '12 at 12:26

Greg%20Perkins's gravatar image

Greg Perkins ♦♦
1002127217


Human perception is limited. We can see some wavelengths of the EM spectrum and not others; we can feel some degrees of pressure and not others; we can taste some substances and not others. Our faculties can perceive changes at some speeds but not others.

That doesn't matter because the standard isn't whether our bare perceptual hardware is able to detect this or that. We build telescopes to bring galaxies down to our scale of perception; we build microscopes to bring molecules up to our scale of perception; we build special cameras to slow down speedy events and speed up slow events and shift light, moving the invisible to the human-visible. We build microphones and amplifiers and pitch-shifters to move the inadible to the audible. On and on.

So one way to put it is that yes, in a relatively unimportant sense man the rational animal can't perceive everything -- but in another very important sense man the rational animal can perceive anything.

answered Oct 14 '12 at 12:41

Greg%20Perkins's gravatar image

Greg Perkins ♦♦
1002127217

edited Oct 14 '12 at 18:30

This is basically right, but I have a quibble. When we look through a telescope, we see a HUGE representation of a distant galaxy, and we thereby become aware of it. The galaxy is something we cannot see. But the telescope allows us to know it is there, and to know what it would look like if we were closer to it.

The laws of physics, and more fundamentally of causality, allow us to build contraptions which allow us to know what we cannot perceive. The contraptions give us perceptible representations of that which exists, but which is imperceptible.

(Oct 15 '12 at 09:09) John Paquette ♦ John%20Paquette's gravatar image

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Share This Page:

Tags:

×10
×5
×1

Asked: Oct 14 '12 at 06:36

Seen: 292 times

Last updated: Oct 15 '12 at 09:09