First time here? Check out the FAQ!
Rand likes to analyze things both metaphysically and epistemologically; can someone give examples of this and explain it?
Oct 06 '12 at 18:08
Oct 06 '12 at 22:52
Greg Perkins ♦♦
You make an assertion, that "Ayn Rand likes to analyze things both metaphysically and epistemologically."
Why do you believe this?
It is not a self-evident fact, so why do you assert it? What is the evidence for your assertion?
oh sorry; in some of her works on axiomatic concepts she says something along the lines of that they (axiomatic concepts) designate metaphysical absolutes and are the products of epistemology necessities. I'm just interested in how you would analyze this. Thanks
ITOE2 pg. 58 This gives us a lead to another special aspect of axiomatic concepts: although they designate a fundamental metaphysical fact, axiomatic concepts are the products of an epistemological need—the need of a volitional, conceptual consciousness which is capable of error and doubt.
Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here
Answers and Comments
You can drop a little love in our tip jar to help keep the lights on!
Asked: Oct 06 '12 at 18:08
Seen: 484 times
Last updated: Oct 08 '12 at 16:24
Do concepts exist?
How can an abstraction like "Existence" exist outside of the mind?
How did the crows count in Rand's story of the "crow epistemology"?
How do we know that reality is independent from consciousness?
Does hearing or reading about something qualify as experiencing it?
Is reality really there?
Does nature use mathematics to compute what to do next?
What are the assumptions of Objectivism?
How can abstract concepts be objective?
What is the Objectivist response to the "liar paradox"?