login about faq

Ayn Rand defines psycho-epistemology as "the study of man’s cognitive processes from the aspect of the interaction between the conscious mind and the automatic functions of the subconscious." Why, then, was it named "psycho-epistemology"? Epistemology is the science of the nature of knowledge whereas psycho-epistemology does not seem to be concerned with knowledge at all.

asked Sep 29 '10 at 19:53

BMV's gravatar image

BMV ♦
292110

edited Sep 30 '10 at 13:38


I wouldn't say psycho-epistemology is not concerned with knowledge at all. It's concerned with the way one thinks, which is the means by which one reached knowledge. The purpose of epistemology is to provide guidance to our conscious thinking processes—the part of our thinking that is under our direct control. The purpose of psycho-epistemology is to understand the role of our subconscious—our psychology—in that process.

Moreover, part of what psycho-epistemology studies is, in effect, the epistemology that one has automatized in one's psychology—one's thinking habits, one's automatized ways of processing information. Accepting a given epistemological theory (whether Objectivist, rationalist, or empiricist) and automatizing the practical advice derived from that theory results in a distinctive set of thinking habits. It is in this sense that we can say someone is, e.g., a rationalist, even if he doesn't consciously accept, or has never even heard of, rationalist epistemology—because he thinks like one, in practice.

All that said—it's not necessarily the greatest term. For one thing, it's kind of long. But it makes sense and it's what we have, so we use it.

answered Sep 30 '10 at 02:16

jasoncrawford's gravatar image

jasoncrawford ♦
10011566

That's a good answer, thank you. Would you agree with the following brief summary? It's called psycho-epistemology because it is the psychological implementation of an epistemology, acknowledged or not. Perhaps in the same way that a sense of life is a psychological implementation of a metaphysics, acknowledged or not?

(Sep 30 '10 at 11:28) BMV ♦ BMV's gravatar image

I agree with the gist of what you're saying, but I wouldn't put it that way. First, "implementation" is not exact. Second, "psycho-epistemology" encompasses a wider range of phenomena than that—for instance, the fact that one's consciousness is limited in the number of units it can consider at once (the "crow" from Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology).

(Oct 01 '10 at 04:28) jasoncrawford ♦ jasoncrawford's gravatar image

There is an extensive collection of excerpts on "Psycho-Epistemology" in The Ayn Rand Lexicon. The second excerpt, in particular (by Leonard Peikoff), seems to answer this question.

answered Sep 30 '10 at 00:07

Ideas%20for%20Life's gravatar image

Ideas for Life ♦
362213

Can you include the excerpt here, as a block quote? That plus a link to the Lexicon online would make this answer much more helpful. Thanks!

(Sep 30 '10 at 02:07) jasoncrawford ♦ jasoncrawford's gravatar image

"“Psycho-epistemology,” a term coined by Ayn Rand, pertains not to the content of a man’s ideas, but to his method of awareness, i.e., the method by which his mind habitually deals with its content."--Peikoff. The link can be accessed here: http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/psycho-epistemology.html

I guess that answers :)

answered May 11 '11 at 03:35

Harsha's gravatar image

Harsha ♦
1038

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Share This Page:

Tags:

×58
×27
×21
×3

Asked: Sep 29 '10 at 19:53

Seen: 2,066 times

Last updated: May 11 '11 at 03:35