login about faq

On my team at work, we have only a very few people who use their time productively. We all get paid for 8 hours of "work", every day, but most of my team would rather talk on their phone, hide from management, and underperform at their job. We also belong to a union, which makes it harder for management to fire the ones who don't work despite being informed about the situation.

I often find myself in the position of helping these people, or going in behind them and fixing their work. I am beginning to feel taken advantage of, and am getting fed up with most of my co-workers. Is it moral to continue helping people who do not take their own work seriously?

asked Dec 15 '11 at 04:51

Semiopathy's gravatar image

Semiopathy
702


How about asking this question instead:

Are you being recognized by your manager for doing a FANTASTIC job? If so, do they have the authority and desire to reward you for it? If not (e.g., lack of justice, union restrictions) then the next question is, do you want to remain working at this company?

If they do recognize and reward you for your outstanding contribution to the company, then you are trading value for value and therefore are not "sacrificing" anything.

answered Dec 17 '11 at 00:35

Humbug's gravatar image

Humbug
5181285

This was a great question, and I answered this question in today's Philosophy in Action webcast. You can listen to the audio segment here:

http://www.philosophyinaction.com/archive/2012-01-08.html

My basic view is that there’s no injustice or other moral problem with doing mission-critical work for your company, even if not your area, provided that you're honest and compensated fairly.

answered Jan 08 '12 at 14:32

Diana%20Hsieh's gravatar image

Diana Hsieh ♦
10004246

Follow this question

By Email:

Once you sign in you will be able to subscribe for any updates here

By RSS:

Answers

Answers and Comments

Share This Page:

Tags:

×23
×16
×9
×8
×2

Asked: Dec 15 '11 at 04:51

Seen: 1,375 times

Last updated: Jan 08 '12 at 14:32